I understand that there is a risk of subjective answers, such as X clan is awesome and so forth, but isn't that why the se system works? If someone posted that kind of an answer, it would be downvoted heavily. There are objective answers/pieces of advice which work for this question, (see my comment).

| |
  • We had a discussion about this on chat. We decided it was too subjective to leave open, plus it was too open-ended as is. – user56 Aug 8 '10 at 22:56
  • 3
    @Arda Some more detail as to how you people came to that conclusion would be nice "Oh, we had a discussion" doesn't really answer the "why". What elements made you all think it was too subjective and open-ended? – Grace Note Aug 9 '10 at 13:40
  • What I said, it's too open-ended. The answers would mostly be a list of clans to join. There's way too much of those to answer the question properly. – user56 Aug 9 '10 at 15:55
  • @Adra I think our discussion was a little more in depth than you seem to be portraying, I'll try ti write up a little more as an answer later. – tzenes Aug 10 '10 at 1:31

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .