Recently, games are being reworked because of it's a very good game or a very classic game. I just don't know how to address them.
One example is "Fable Anniversary", it's 'Fable 1' or 'Fable - The Lost Chapters', and we don't have many questions in that area. But it's still valid questions right?
The answer is... It Depends.
Specifically, it depends on if the game is a Remake or a Remaster.
So, what exactly is the difference?
Remakes take the core concepts and/or story of the game and rework how it plays.
Examples of Remakes are: Shadowgate 2014 and Metroid: Zero Mission.
For these, each version should have their own tag as the questions for one will not be related to the questions for the other.
Remasters do not change the core game, they only update it with new graphics, sounds, and controls.
Examples of Remasters are: Secret of Monkey Island: Special Edition and Grim Fandango Remastered.
Remasters should not have their own tags unless it is something specific to the version, such as a technical support type question or how to switch control schemes.
Personally, I believe that each game should have its own tag and not each version/re-release.
If each version had its own tag it becomes hard to follow the tag (well, you need to follow multiple tags when you only want to be aware of anything to do with Fable 1 as in your example).
Additionally, a question could potentially be tagged against one of the multiple versions on offer therefore people following one version of the tag would miss the question.
If a question is specific to a certain version it can be added to the question (e.g. only occurs in ...). Otherwise, we can safely assume the question relates to any version of the game in question.
Unless someone can provide an example where a game should be split up I don't see a feasible alternative. Look at existing tags for Half Life and Monkey Island where questions can be safely asked regarding different versions without needing additional tags.
