Timeline for There's a character limit for editing a post?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2019 at 1:07 | history | edited | RobotnikMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
this wasn't requesting anything, so removed feature-request tag. Did a slight cleanup too.
|
| Nov 9, 2011 at 17:25 | comment | added | badp Mod | Uh... you only have 1,122 reputation, so you're still a few hundred reputation short to full edit access; indeed, the edit in question had to be approved. Once you do hit 2,000 reputation, you can make edits unsupervised and the edit size restriction will be lifted too. | |
| Nov 9, 2011 at 15:57 | answer | added | Dave DuPlantis | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 9, 2011 at 14:57 | answer | added | Oak | timeline score: 7 | |
| Nov 9, 2011 at 11:51 | comment | added | Dave DuPlantis | I'm not sure you've shown that there is a problem. If this answer is the one to which you are referring, the existing limit made you make a more substantial edit that ended up being accepted, and that made the answer better. | |
| Nov 9, 2011 at 3:43 | comment | added | Mr. November | I'm not sure why we should have to resort to using comments just because the more direct method has a fixable problem. | |
| Nov 9, 2011 at 3:40 | comment | added | Dave DuPlantis | Why not simply leave a comment for the person, telling them what the correct date is? That way, they can fix it, or someone with permissions can fix it, or at worst, we'll see the correct answer in your comment. | |
| Nov 9, 2011 at 3:31 | history | asked | Mr. November | CC BY-SA 3.0 |