Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:09 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://gaming.stackexchange.com/ with https://gaming.stackexchange.com/
Oct 7, 2010 at 18:30 comment added Elpezmuerto @TomWij, I didn't think about the reputation involved, my bad.
Oct 7, 2010 at 17:37 history edited OakMod
edited tags
Oct 7, 2010 at 16:33 answer added tzenes timeline score: 3
Oct 7, 2010 at 16:23 history edited Elpezmuerto CC BY-SA 2.5
deleted 117 characters in body; edited title
Oct 7, 2010 at 16:22 comment added Tamara Wijsman You should have first asked whether breaking them up was fine, by doing them yourself you're only taking reputation away from the original author and in this case it resulted in a mess too. Perhaps Juan Manuel suggested to narrow "strategies / match-ups / build orders / resource sharing / tactics" instead of "2v2 / 3v3 / 4v4"...
Oct 7, 2010 at 16:22 comment added Elpezmuerto Well since it seems we reach consensus on that it was a duplicate, lets tackle etiquette
Oct 7, 2010 at 16:13 comment added tzenes @Grace I think the etiquette of breaking up a multi-part question is definitely on topic. I think that discussion is more correctly suited to meta rather than discussing "team strategy" type questions.
Oct 7, 2010 at 16:03 comment added Elpezmuerto "Team strategy" type questions because it is something we need to address, this scenario just inspired me to bring it to meta
Oct 7, 2010 at 15:59 comment added Grace Note StaffMod Alright, do we want to limit this question to talking about "team strategy" type questions, or is that just a decoy log used to mask the much different issue of the etiquette of breaking up a multi-part question that someone else asked?
Oct 7, 2010 at 15:57 answer added badp timeline score: 1
Oct 7, 2010 at 15:50 history asked Elpezmuerto CC BY-SA 2.5