7
This question is based on a slight misunderstanding. It's true that posts are a collaborative effort, but that doesn't mean post authorship is completely nonexistant. Just a look at the voting and badges system should tell you that Stack Exchange values the connection between posts and their authors, and that leaving a post's content to its author is ...
6
We are completely against users asking or answering questions that involve illegal activity. So much so that if you merely imply that you're pirating a game, your post will be removed.
However, violating a EULA in and of itself is not illegal. We are not here to police contracts which in some jurisdictions are partially or completely unenforceable. We ...
1
This does not apply to third party comments. Otherwise that would be kind of a loophole. Think about it, you can't make drastic changes to other people's posts but if you comment it then you're allowed to edit it in because it was found in a comment. Obviously that's pretty stupid at its arbitrary level.
This edit is debatable because it is riding the line ...
Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible
Related Tags
site-policies × 68discussion × 65
allowed-questions × 16
closing × 7
tags × 3
minecraft × 3
exact-duplicates × 3
game-identification × 3
game-recommendations × 3
game-piracy × 3
support × 2
flags × 2
editing × 2
comments × 2
scope × 2
legal × 2
community-wiki × 2
cheats × 2
poll × 2
feature-request × 1
questions × 1
answers × 1
status-declined × 1
site-promotion × 1
allowed-answers × 1