Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with site-policies
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 3129
Use this tag when asking about policy of any kind, either from rules or from community consensus.
3
votes
Accepted
How should we deal with out of date questions/answers?
The 'standard' such as it seems to exist across other SE Sites, as I understand it, is as follows:
If the question is no longer relevant or no longer makes sense, (i.e. asking about a game mechanic t …
- 76.5k
1
vote
How should we deal with questions and answers about rapidly changing games?
The 'standard' such as it exists across other SE Sites, as I understand it, is as follows:
If the question is no longer relevant or no longer makes sense, (i.e. asking about a game mechanic that has …
- 76.5k
10
votes
What issues must be resolved before we vote on keeping "Identify This Game" questions?
As of now, fundamentally, I think of ITG as the crackhouse in our neighborhood. I, and many of those who agree with me, think of the tag as a blight on the neighborood that needs to be torn down and r …
CommunityBot
- 1
5
votes
Accepted
Should we have a policy for when a question is answerable, yet has an unreasonably large scope?
There's a time to post a table, and there's a time to post a link. Sometimes, a question that is enormously broad in scope may not be directly answerable by us, but with our expertise, we can direct t …
- 76.5k