I noticed that the Arqade Meta doesn't have "Meta" in its logo. Was this purposeful or accidental?
Not a top priority, but I suggest that Arqade Meta has the Meta text in its logo.
-
9There is a usability issue here: to someone completely colour-blind (Wikipedia says 1/30,000 people) main and meta are indistinguishable.– fredleyAug 2, 2014 at 19:21
-
3@fredley Colour-blind users can still read URLs– CalebAug 3, 2014 at 5:57
-
2Looks like this was changed using the accepted answer's design, so I'm tagging as status-completed.– WriggleniteSep 8, 2020 at 19:05
Add a comment
|
1 Answer
I took the liberty of creating a new vector graphic with the 'meta' included. I'm not a vector graphics pro, but using Inkscape and copying and manipulating the existing objects I was able to create something reasonable:
And a screenshot of how that will look (the vague horizontal line in the 't' has been fixed):
The SVG can be found here.
Alternatively (in response to JMac's comment):
The corresponding SVG can be found here.
-
1The only thing I would suggest different would be having the word meta be smaller than Arqade. I find it makes it look closer to the main site, while still making the differences obvious. This also seems to be how most sites with designs handle it.– JMacMar 17, 2020 at 19:02
-
2
-
Nice. I was just thinking making the word smaller, but that red box looks like a good touch to me.– JMacMar 17, 2020 at 23:02
-
@JMac Yeah, I think I know what you were referring to, but looking for an svg file, I found this on StackOverflow Meta, and thought it would add a nice accent.– JoachimMar 17, 2020 at 23:07
-
-
2Amazing work! I'm gonna add an answer to our CM review post to hopefully get this one addressed– Robotnik ModMar 24, 2020 at 4:16
-
1
-