I once stumbled upon a question, and I wanted to be a bit charitable. So I opened up the bounty menu, and it says that the minimum is 50 points. I don't want to give so much of my reputation; I only want to give 15 or 25 points, something that attracts people to the question but doesn't require a lot of sacrifice. Why can't the minimum be something lower for those who don't have as much rep?

  • 3
    You'll will find soon enough that 50 rep is virtually negligible :) Jan 19, 2014 at 17:22

2 Answers 2


An upvote is +10 reputation. An accept tick is +15 reputation. Both of them together is +25 reputation.

Making bounties that "cheap" would essentially make them extra upvotes/accepts. That's not what bounties are for. Bounties are to reward exceptional content and draw attention to a question that needs additional attention - resulting in users going out of their way to answer a question that would, otherwise, be left to rot.

  • Can you define "exceptional?" What kind of things does the question have to meet in order to deserve a bounty? There are plenty of questions out there that rot, especially on other sites.
    – oldmud0
    Jan 19, 2014 at 16:57
  • @oldmud0 A bounty is completely at the discretion of whoever wants to give it. But generally, bounties are intended to reward an answer that was much needed - either because it includes lots and lots of detail, or because the question didn't get a sufficient answer at all until that point.
    – user98085
    Jan 19, 2014 at 16:58

Giving lower amounts of reputation would devalue the purpose of a bounty - bounties push the question the bounty is placed on in to it's own tab which dramatically reduces the number of questions it has to compete against and increases its visibility.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .