Hi, I (not really) asked about interesting bugs which are messing up game logic. For me it's interesting or funny to see what scenarios developer did not think about.
I can't see a difference of question-quality to several game-recs or on Stackoverflow questions about bad design.
Please explain the quality-difference.
The special value of my question is that I can not get the answer from my Amazon-reccomendation, or simply from a walkthrough.
Bonus-question: Sorry for sarcasm: If I called my question "Games that have bugs which mess up game-logic" would it not have been closed? It's a game-rec question so it would have been controverse but legal.
I see that questions which demand list-answers are not appreciated, but then you should at least be consistent.