My answer has a negative review. I did research. I enacted the research. I answered. Yet people aren't satisfied with a reasonable answer. Why is that?
My guess is that it's due to the elaboration "You can't dye snow golems because you can't dye snow." That implies a whole host of other dyable/not dyable things that don't necessarily work in Minecraft.
By the way, I'd upvoted that post when I first saw it because it seemed like you proved the question conclusively, regardless of the questionable assumption you drew from it.
I'm not sure why you had to post a meta question to ask this when there has been a comment under your answer from the same day which tells you the problem with it:
That... logic makes no sense.
It has 13 upvotes right now, indicating that the answer could potentially have 10 more downvotes if people weren't being polite and refraining from piling on. Consider fixing the broken logical statement in the answer if you would like people to reconsider those downvotes.