7

Today, the front page has been flooded by new answers in the tag.

The problem here (aside from the horrible formatting and nonsensical additional text) is that these answers are identical and by the same user. They're also an "all-encompassing" guide on this topic - only a tiny part of the answer actually relates to the question.

The user also has been warned before about misuse of the site.

Downvoting this behavior risks reversal due to serial downvoting, editing seems pointless as the answers have loads of problems in addition to not being specific enough and flagging them seems inappropriate as they are answers and they are valid ... Kinda, sorta. If you only look at the one question + answer.

So, what are we supposed to do in this situation? How should we solve this without going crazy?

| |
  • If the user keeps doing it, flag for moderator attention citing plagiarism – user27134 Jul 4 '13 at 13:28
  • 2
    @kalina Well, is it even plagiarism? It seems to be the user's own work. Just that they have ... posted it over and over again. – user98085 Jul 4 '13 at 13:29
  • 3
    Either way, repeatedly posting unwanted material is spam, and this user is a spammer. – fredley Jul 4 '13 at 13:33
  • 2
    The problem is that this user refuses to follow advice and only copy the relevant parts from his "guide". He has been explicitly told not to do what he's doing, and he's doing it anyways. Yes, much of the information is valid, but there's no reason to post the same thing in multiple locations. It is currently meeting the definition of self-promotion spam. – Frank♦ Jul 4 '13 at 13:36
  • The bottom one isn't related as far as I can tell. That's someone else doing something else silly :P – agent86 Jul 4 '13 at 14:11
  • @agent86 That might well be, that one was deleted by the time I added it ... Wasn't sure which one that was. – user98085 Jul 4 '13 at 14:33
11

In my opinion this user's current behaviour falls under the definition of spamming, and as such that user should be treated like any other spammer.

There is however the fact that this user has made helpful posts in the past. Despite this, I'd still advocate disciplinary action be taken for the following reasons:

  • The bad content from this user far outweighs the good
  • The user displays an unwillingness to learn from past warnings

At the end of the day is this user going to benefit this site or be a detriment to it? From the available evidence I'd have to wager the latter.

| |
  • 2
    From what i have read from him i'd agree with the latter too. He seems ignorant and waves away every advice highly valued users give him. – Madmenyo Jul 4 '13 at 17:32
10

When you have a serious issue:

  1. Step one is flag the issue.
  2. Step two is do nothing.

If you don't do step 1, we don't have a clue what is going on. Making a meta can be an alternative to flagging if it's complicated enough that you can't fit it into the flag box, but it makes step 2 more complicated.

If you don't do step 2, suddenly the user is being piled upon by a dozen people telling him slightly different information, which leads to confusion and frustration. It also makes it really hard for us to come in and give a definitive resolution.

| |
  • 2
    As a follow up, I've contacted this user and explained why this isn't acceptable. – agent86 Jul 4 '13 at 14:26
  • 1
    To be fair, this wasn't really anything that needed mod intervention until his recent actions. Before that, the community handled it without much of a problem. – Frank♦ Jul 4 '13 at 14:44
  • 10
    3. Check your flag history obsessively and then come to Meta and yell at badp when he disagrees with you. – Matthew Read Jul 4 '13 at 15:00
  • 3
    Step 3 is the most important step. – LessPop_MoreFizz Jul 4 '13 at 15:04
  • @MatthewRead a moderator reviewed your flag but found no appropriate way to mod abuse the problem out of existence – badp Jul 5 '13 at 0:01

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .