Namco's F-1 (1976) electro-mechanical arcade racing game bears such strong resemblance to a "modern" video game that I'm wondering if it should be considered on-topic. The game itself is certainly likely to appeal to video game players, and was also made by a company now famous for "true" racing video games. The only major difference between this game and games like Pole Position and Ridge Racer is that F-1 generates its screen output through a set of lights, mirrors, gears, and physical props rather than by sending an electronic video output signal to a display.
Is F-1 enough of a video game to qualify as in-scope for this site, or does a game need to have a "true" video output signal to qualify?
I know that we have a Meta question about pinball machines, with the current vote tallies being barely in favor of off-topicality, but electro-mechanical racing games are (IMHO) much closer in look and feel to today's video games than their electro-mechanical pinball cousins are.
One argument could be that this game is too simplistic to be worthy of the label of video game. The scenery repeats after only a few seconds, and there is no level progression. My response to that is that it is no less complex than Pong (1972), and Pong is unquestionably on-topic.