Feedback regarding review suspension

Question

I have been suspended from reviewing, and I believe it is unjustified.

See the review in question here. I reviewed it as 'Not an answer'.

The question can be found here. I reviewed it as 'Looks OK'.

This is the feedback I got:

You approved answers that should have been deleted instead. If you believe an answer is "in no way constructive", then please review it with Recommend Deletion. If a post does not attempt to answer a question, then please flag it as Not an Answer.

I believe both of my flags are completely reasonable:

• The first reviewed answer ("A is not working for some reason") is not an answer to the question "In Super Mario Bros which button is used to run and to jump?".
• The second reviewed answer ("Just keeps practicing") is an answer to the question "How can I get better at building in Fallout 4?". It's not a good answer, that's why I left a comment, but it is an answer.

Furthermore, the feedback given seemingly only addresses the second of these reviews I performed. And the first reviewed answer got deleted anyway.

There have been several more unapproved flags throughout my activity record which I think were refuted for the wrong reasons, but since reviewing takes a certain amount of interpretation (both for moderators and us plebs) I never wanted to bring them up and make a big deal out of any of those. Yet now I feel this is an unwarranted disapproval of the time I spent here trying to be a constructive part of the community. Don't get me wrong, I know I make mistakes, but in this case I can't discern them.

I look forward to a more in-depth reaction from the moderator who blocked me from the review queues.

Answer 1

For the first review

See the review in question here. I reviewed it as 'Not an answer'.

The actual review can be found here. As you can see, you reviewed the post with "No Action Needed". Hence the part of the feedback message saying

If a post does not attempt to answer a question, then please flag it as Not an Answer.

For the second review

The question can be found here. I reviewed it as 'Looks OK'.

The actual review can be found here. You reviewed the post as "Looks OK", but you left a comment saying the answer is "in no way constructive". If you feel the need to post that comment, it's very strange to review the post as "Looks OK", meaning it doesn't need any other edits to be a good answer. Hence the part of the feedback message saying

If you believe an answer is "in no way constructive", then please review it with Recommend Deletion.

You said

It's not a good answer, that's why I left a comment, but it is an answer.

However the queue is called Low Quality Queue. The point is to delete posts that are of such low quality as to be completely unhelpful. This includes posts that are not answers, but is not limited to them. Indeed, the help page linked mentions

• Recommend deletion or Delete if you think that an answer does not address the question at all, is link-only, or is incomprehensible. Do not vote to delete answers that are simply wrong. You may leave a comment explaining the issues with the answer, or choose one of the provided canned comments.

Commenting that an answer is "in no way constructive" seems to fall squarely into this case.

A review suspension is not meant to be a punishment, especially the first time. It is meant to be a way to let you know "Hey, we've noticed something weird in your reviews, maybe it could help to slow down a little and make sure you're choosing the right action". Given this meta post, the suspension seems to have helped in that regard.