I have been suspended from reviewing, and I believe it is unjustified.
See the review in question here. I reviewed it as 'Not an answer'.
The question can be found here. I reviewed it as 'Looks OK'.
This is the feedback I got:
You approved answers that should have been deleted instead. If you believe an answer is "in no way constructive", then please review it with Recommend Deletion. If a post does not attempt to answer a question, then please flag it as Not an Answer.
I believe both of my flags are completely reasonable:
- The first reviewed answer ("A is not working for some reason") is not an answer to the question "In Super Mario Bros which button is used to run and to jump?".
- The second reviewed answer ("Just keeps practicing") is an answer to the question "How can I get better at building in Fallout 4?". It's not a good answer, that's why I left a comment, but it is an answer.
Furthermore, the feedback given seemingly only addresses the second of these reviews I performed. And the first reviewed answer got deleted anyway.
There have been several more unapproved flags throughout my activity record which I think were refuted for the wrong reasons, but since reviewing takes a certain amount of interpretation (both for moderators and us plebs) I never wanted to bring them up and make a big deal out of any of those. Yet now I feel this is an unwarranted disapproval of the time I spent here trying to be a constructive part of the community. Don't get me wrong, I know I make mistakes, but in this case I can't discern them.
I look forward to a more in-depth reaction from the moderator who blocked me from the review queues.