Someone in chat just asked about an edit to a question where they added in a transcript for an image where the question asks about certain text within that image. Essentially, one of the reviewers rejected the suggested edit with the reason being that "the edit deviates from the original intent of the poster".
For me personally, rejecting an edit that adds additional accessibility to a question, especially with the "changes the intent" reason, even if it doesn't add anything else, seems wrong. But I may be wrong on that topic, which is why I wanted to get a meta ruling on the matter.
Do we consider an edit that makes a question or answer more accessible by adding a video or image transcript a meaningful edit?