The following question was closed as opinion-based:
How do the Nintendo Switch graphics compare to the Playstation 3?
I agree that a question which asks if a console is 'better' in general would be opinion-based, but I don't believe answers to this question would be opinion-based. When specifically comparing graphics, it can be answered 'technically'. No one will argue that Switch games look better than PlayStation 4 games graphically (in general), because the GPU (in most cases) determines the quality of graphics. And do we compare GPUs? We do! And we compare GPUs technically: FLOPS, APIs, etc.
So I believe answers to the above question is not opinion-based. By the way, as a matter of fact there are many similar questions on the Internet and I already know the answer thanks to those questions. Still I wanted to ask here because I think Stackoverflow is a better place for Q&A (and I answered by myself by collecting the info from the Internet).
But I am not sure if the question should be active. Because even if the question can be answered technically with relative accuracy, many people don't like the result. Many many Nintendo fans would not like to accept the fact that PS4 is more powerful than Switch, for me that is understandable because I used to deny that PlayStation 2 is weaker than contemporary high-end PC! But that is simply untrue. By the way, I am a Switch owner.
So if the question is active, I'm afraid more and more Nintendo fans will down vote my question (I wanted to do something good for the Stackoverflow!).
I ask for reopen of the above question, but if there is no way to protect myself from being down voted (account reputation is very important to me!), I prefer the question to be in a status that no one can vote (down or up).
I would like to add links of some similar (almost exact) questions here to show that indeed many people care about the question