How should I flag "how do I attack this base" questions?

Question

This meta states that these questions are off topic, but I was wondering how I should flag these questions when they crop up. I have seen them be closed as primarily opinion based, too broad, and as off topic in different cases. However, looking at the reasons to close for off topic, none of them really fit. This is about the closest reason, but it still doesn't really fit.

• Questions that ask for recommendations of games, software, or hardware are off topic.

They aren't asking for a game recommendation, but rather a strategy. When I see them, I generally flag them as primarily opinion based, or too broad. Is this the correct practice? Also, as a related problem, if there are old questions of this form, is it bad practice to flag them as too broad or primarily opinion based when they are still open and have an accepted answer, like this one?

Note: This is not a duplicate of this meta, I understand that they are off topic, my question is how to flag them, which is not addressed at all in this question.

Answer 1

_{N.B.: I haven't played Clash of Clans, and I have only the vaguest familiarity with the genre as a whole; however, I think this is representative of a larger set of overly specific and situational questions that are generally unique to multiplayer or procedural games of this nature, without clearly defined content, and this answer should serve as a broad based way of approaching problem questions of this sort.}

I'd Close them as Unclear What You Are Asking.

"But the question is perfectly clear, he's asking how to attack that base!!"

To use a tortured analogy, this is essentially equivalent to posting a big block of code on StackOverflow and saying "PLZ DEBUG". The question does not offer any real answerable question, but rather a situation, with the vague intimation that there is somehow a problem. As the highest voted answer on our previous question on the subject notes, often lurking underneath these questions are good, answerable, and specific challenges that need to be overcome. We should encourage users who ask these sorts of questions to identify what specifically is preventing them from reaching their objective, and to ask specifically about how to overcome that challenge or counter the specific plays that have them hung up.

This has the added advantage of creating an actual knowledge base that can be referred to, as future questions can be properly duplicated, and better yet, people can find that information via The Googles.

Answer 2

Note: This was was proposed as a feature-request but never got off the ground, hence the acceptance of the other answer.

Personally, I feel we don't have a good close reason for those type of questions. I won't debate that in this answer, instead I propose we add a new close reason to cover those type of questions.

What I'll like to be able to choose, is a reason similar to the Too localized SO once had, which is now reworded, but worked out for Arqade.

The wording could be this :

Title for the selection : One time question

This question is about a situation only the asker is facing and would be hard to reproduce by another player (like a base setup, exact number of troops, etc). The answers to this question would not be of any help to other players. These questions should be changed to be more about strategies to adopt.

The title is pretty clear, it would be for questions that wouldn't benefit anyone but the asker.

We're mainly facing Clash of clans question that would fit this but there's many other games for which a question would be about a specific, asker-only, problem.