My question Are Terrans objectively better than Protoss at Aggression/Harass? received three downvotes, so I'm guessing there is some problem with it. However, no one left a comment to explain why. So my question is, whats wrong with my question?
I read the tour, and I believe my question fits into the "Gameplay strategies and tactics" and "Game mechanics and terminology" category. I am asking whether a certain race (Protoss) has the mechanics necessary to perform a certain tactic (Aggression/Harassment).
My question is definitely about gaming, since I am asking for strategies, tactics, and mechanics of a specific game (StarCraft 2).
I am not making a request for game identification or recommendation. I already know that the game I want to play is StarCraft 2. I am not asking what race I should play, I am asking how well a race (Protoss) performs.
My question is not primarily opinion-based, speculative, or gossipy, because I am asking for objective facts, with pro league player replays to back it up if possible. Perhaps a timing calculation to show Terran will always have more units than Protoss at game time xx:xx, for example.
I bought StarCraft 2 legally, so I am not asking about pirated games.
I don't think my question has too many possible answers, because I'm asking about a specific aspect of the game. (I'm asking whether Protoss is as good as Terran at Aggression and Harassment in particular. I am not asking about which race is better overall.)
As for whether the answer would be too long, I'm not sure how I am supposed to know that? I am quite satisfied with a something like "No, player xxx did it just fine in tournament yyy against player vs zzz".
So can someone explain why my question is so terrible that it has 3 downvotes, even though I followed the tour? Thanks.