Timeline for Re-evaluating our site - what is the scope of an "acceptable" list, if it exists?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2010 at 16:07 | comment | added | tzenes | I strongly disagree with this one. I think the high level of permutations are the reason this belongs in an SE. Consider the following scenario: You are a new player to a difficult game; you wish to excel; you are blocked in this goal by people with more experience. Your solution therefor is to seek out a better way. Forums? You'll be shunned for asking for known info. FAQs? how could you evaluate a good from a bad. In the end the SE engine provide good mechanisms through reputation and removing duplicate answers to help solve this problem. These are questions SE was made for. | |
| Jul 23, 2010 at 8:37 | comment | added | Kempeth | I just want to clarify: Upvotes mean that you agree that this reasoning should be used to exclude questions from the site. | |
| Jul 22, 2010 at 13:10 | history | answered | Kempeth | CC BY-SA 2.5 |