Skip to main content
replaced http://gaming.stackexchange.com/ with https://gaming.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

In the case of , all anybody is doing is guessing. That's kind of the primary problem of the tag, and it's one of the reasons I (and many others) happen to think it's a terrible class of questions. So no, there's nothing wrong about doing so in those circumstances.

As for other questions that are more concretely answerable: A lot of it is situational. The key is, even if you're conjecturing, you'd better be able to a)back it up, b) hit up The Google and do a sanity check to make sure you're not way off base, and c) provide a 'complete' solution via your conjecture, not just take a stab at the right direction to head.

Here's a pretty good example of an answer that's just taking a stab at things.Here's a pretty good example of an answer that's just taking a stab at things. - There's a pretty good chance he's wrong in this case, but he's basing his conjecture on actual knowledge, pointing out that it is just an idea, and most importantly, even if it's a wrong answer, it's still a complete answer.

So long as both of those are true, go for it - just be sure to note that you're taking an educated guess at things, and be ready for the downvotes if you happen to be wrong.

In the case of , all anybody is doing is guessing. That's kind of the primary problem of the tag, and it's one of the reasons I (and many others) happen to think it's a terrible class of questions. So no, there's nothing wrong about doing so in those circumstances.

As for other questions that are more concretely answerable: A lot of it is situational. The key is, even if you're conjecturing, you'd better be able to a)back it up, b) hit up The Google and do a sanity check to make sure you're not way off base, and c) provide a 'complete' solution via your conjecture, not just take a stab at the right direction to head.

Here's a pretty good example of an answer that's just taking a stab at things. - There's a pretty good chance he's wrong in this case, but he's basing his conjecture on actual knowledge, pointing out that it is just an idea, and most importantly, even if it's a wrong answer, it's still a complete answer.

So long as both of those are true, go for it - just be sure to note that you're taking an educated guess at things, and be ready for the downvotes if you happen to be wrong.

In the case of , all anybody is doing is guessing. That's kind of the primary problem of the tag, and it's one of the reasons I (and many others) happen to think it's a terrible class of questions. So no, there's nothing wrong about doing so in those circumstances.

As for other questions that are more concretely answerable: A lot of it is situational. The key is, even if you're conjecturing, you'd better be able to a)back it up, b) hit up The Google and do a sanity check to make sure you're not way off base, and c) provide a 'complete' solution via your conjecture, not just take a stab at the right direction to head.

Here's a pretty good example of an answer that's just taking a stab at things. - There's a pretty good chance he's wrong in this case, but he's basing his conjecture on actual knowledge, pointing out that it is just an idea, and most importantly, even if it's a wrong answer, it's still a complete answer.

So long as both of those are true, go for it - just be sure to note that you're taking an educated guess at things, and be ready for the downvotes if you happen to be wrong.

added 359 characters in body
Source Link
LessPop_MoreFizz
  • 76.5k
  • 3
  • 59
  • 114

In the case of , all anybody is doing is guessing. That's kind of the primary problem of the tag, and it's one of the reasons I (and many others) happen to think it's a terrible class of questions. So no, there's nothing wrong about doing so in those circumstances.

As for other questions that are more concretely answerable: A lot of it is situational. The key is, even if you're conjecturing, you'd better be able to a)back it up, b) hit up The Google and do a sanity check to make sure you're not way off base, and c) provide a 'complete' solution via your conjecture, not just take a stab at the right direction to head.

Here's a pretty good example of an answer that's just taking a stab at things. - There's a pretty good chance he's wrong in this case, but he's basing his conjecture on actual knowledge, pointing out that it is just an idea, and most importantly, even if it's a wrong answer, it's still a complete answer.

So long as both of those are true, go for it - just be sure to note that you're taking an educated guess at things, and be ready for the downvotes if you happen to be wrong.

In the case of , all anybody is doing is guessing. That's kind of the primary problem of the tag, and it's one of the reasons I (and many others) happen to think it's a terrible class of questions. So no, there's nothing wrong about doing so in those circumstances.

As for other questions that are more concretely answerable: A lot of it is situational. The key is, even if you're conjecturing, you'd better be able to a)back it up, b) hit up The Google and do a sanity check to make sure you're not way off base, and c) provide a 'complete' solution via your conjecture, not just take a stab at the right direction to head.

So long as both of those are true, go for it - just be sure to note that you're taking an educated guess at things, and be ready for the downvotes if you happen to be wrong.

In the case of , all anybody is doing is guessing. That's kind of the primary problem of the tag, and it's one of the reasons I (and many others) happen to think it's a terrible class of questions. So no, there's nothing wrong about doing so in those circumstances.

As for other questions that are more concretely answerable: A lot of it is situational. The key is, even if you're conjecturing, you'd better be able to a)back it up, b) hit up The Google and do a sanity check to make sure you're not way off base, and c) provide a 'complete' solution via your conjecture, not just take a stab at the right direction to head.

Here's a pretty good example of an answer that's just taking a stab at things. - There's a pretty good chance he's wrong in this case, but he's basing his conjecture on actual knowledge, pointing out that it is just an idea, and most importantly, even if it's a wrong answer, it's still a complete answer.

So long as both of those are true, go for it - just be sure to note that you're taking an educated guess at things, and be ready for the downvotes if you happen to be wrong.

Source Link
LessPop_MoreFizz
  • 76.5k
  • 3
  • 59
  • 114

In the case of , all anybody is doing is guessing. That's kind of the primary problem of the tag, and it's one of the reasons I (and many others) happen to think it's a terrible class of questions. So no, there's nothing wrong about doing so in those circumstances.

As for other questions that are more concretely answerable: A lot of it is situational. The key is, even if you're conjecturing, you'd better be able to a)back it up, b) hit up The Google and do a sanity check to make sure you're not way off base, and c) provide a 'complete' solution via your conjecture, not just take a stab at the right direction to head.

So long as both of those are true, go for it - just be sure to note that you're taking an educated guess at things, and be ready for the downvotes if you happen to be wrong.