Timeline for What should be done about [Strategy] and similar tags? What conventions should we be adhering to?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:10 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://gaming.stackexchange.com/ with https://gaming.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Oct 27, 2010 at 1:02 | comment | added | tzenes | @less Id point out the obvious flaw in your argument but grace beat me to it | |
| Oct 26, 2010 at 16:23 | comment | added | LessPop_MoreFizz | Another good example then: "Weapons"+ [Team-Fortress-2] -gaming.stackexchange.com/search?q=weapon+%5Bteam-fortress-2%5D is much more useful than [Weapons] + [Team-Fortress-2] -gaming.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/… | |
| Oct 26, 2010 at 6:23 | history | edited | tzenes | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Oct 26, 2010 at 6:20 | comment | added | tzenes | @Less I'd only consider one of those strategy, but even still, doesn't that mean that question is miss tagged? not that the search is better? What's more none of the others from that search seem to fit... | |
| Oct 26, 2010 at 6:14 | comment | added | LessPop_MoreFizz | Bad example... that one is even TAGGED [Strategy]. Questions like 1 2 3 and others show up in the search, but lack the tag. | |
| Oct 26, 2010 at 6:11 | comment | added | tzenes | @Less does it? or does that give me every question with the word strategy in it? Look at this question definitely not strategy. Heck, if just word searches were enough, then we wouldn't need the tag [Civilization-5] either. | |
| Oct 26, 2010 at 5:40 | comment | added | LessPop_MoreFizz | The problem is that gaming.stackexchange.com/search?q=Strategy+%5BCivilization-5%5D works even better. | |
| Oct 26, 2010 at 5:20 | history | answered | tzenes | CC BY-SA 2.5 |