Timeline for Should we reword the closure text for duplicate questions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2018 at 1:52 | history | edited | Timmy JimMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Aug 28, 2017 at 15:14 | comment | added | Timmy Jim Mod | @MageXy precisely. | |
| Aug 28, 2017 at 15:14 | comment | added | Mage Xy | Oh I see. So the text in the "public" notice is targeted towards visitors who are doing research and considering asking their own question. | |
| Aug 28, 2017 at 13:41 | history | edited | RobotnikMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
'Meta' by itself was confusing as Arqade Meta is also called 'Meta' sometimes. How meta.
|
| Aug 28, 2017 at 12:46 | vote | accept | Timmy JimMod | ||
| Aug 28, 2017 at 12:45 | history | edited | Timmy JimMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 351 characters in body
|
| Aug 23, 2017 at 13:30 | comment | added | nightsurfer | Perfect! I like it a lot, it brings the duplicate explanation in line with other close reasons as well. | |
| Aug 23, 2017 at 13:29 | comment | added | Timmy Jim Mod | @Kaizerwolf yes - example - the close text has the same functionality that I propose. | |
| Aug 23, 2017 at 13:28 | comment | added | nightsurfer | Can that edit link be smart enough to reference the currently on hold post every time? I'm not familiar enough with that sort of coding, though I like the idea. | |
| Aug 22, 2017 at 20:11 | history | answered | Timmy JimMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |