Timeline for Duplicate trial: "Duplicate" to "Not a Duplicate" to "Now a Duplicate" process
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2018 at 5:41 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:10 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://gaming.stackexchange.com/ with https://gaming.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 16:01 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.gaming.stackexchange.com/ with https://gaming.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Sep 26, 2016 at 9:00 | comment | added | user101016 | @DCShannon. I'm not suggesting either, this is more to do with the initial proposal. It wasn't clear if the intention was to then go back and close questions as duplicates once "lacking answers" were fixed. | |
| Sep 26, 2016 at 6:45 | answer | added | Schism | timeline score: -1 | |
| Sep 23, 2016 at 21:17 | comment | added | DCShannon | Are you suggesting adding the new content (SA has same Pokemon as NA) into the existing answer for the 1st question, or adding a new answer? | |
| Sep 20, 2016 at 13:28 | history | asked | user101016 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |