Timeline for Please don't discourage new users from using this site
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:09 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://gaming.stackexchange.com/ with https://gaming.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Mar 4, 2016 at 13:24 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/TheArqade/status/705745793433669632 | ||
Mar 4, 2016 at 13:15 | comment | added | labyrinth | Now it's at -10. I've been using SO and several other SE sites for years and rarely see less than a -1 unless the user is being completely belligerent. That alone tells me the community here is more like Shirley Jackson's "Lottery" than a healthy group of enthusiasts sharing a common interest. | |
Feb 22, 2016 at 4:57 | answer | added | Ben | timeline score: 6 | |
Feb 21, 2016 at 18:50 | comment | added | Daedric | I think the question was answerable, and if the OP is a first and last time user who is too lazy to make a 16x16 building, let alone write a proper answer we can still edit the answer to be more succinct for future users, in stead of just voting to close. I didn't see the edit but I just mean in general as long as the question isn't completely overhauled. | |
Feb 21, 2016 at 10:01 | answer | added | MrLemon | timeline score: 14 | |
Feb 21, 2016 at 2:20 | comment | added | Robotnik Mod | Related: Let's be nice to each other | |
Feb 21, 2016 at 1:38 | history | edited | Frank | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 10 characters in body; edited title
|
Feb 21, 2016 at 1:37 | comment | added | Frank | It was closed as unclear. Which it was. Whether they're a new user or not matters not at all. It's all about the question quality. There was none there. | |
Feb 21, 2016 at 1:23 | history | asked | John | CC BY-SA 3.0 |