Return to Question

As far as I understand, putting the name of a game (aka a tag) in a title is not needed at all, unless its in the flow of the question.
Yet one of my edits was rejected because: "This edit does not make the post even a little bit easier to read, easier to find, more accurate or more accessible. Changes are either completely superfluous or actively harm readability."

I understand it was not a major edit and that the reject comment is correct in some way, but I still followed the guidelines. (i think)
According to these 2 threads on the meta, my edit was valid.

• Proposed edit rejected because it is too minor
• When should we edit game names out of question titles and why

And even here it says that question titles should not be "tag: question title"

I don't want to go around making bad or unnecessary edits, but I am under the impression that I was doing a valid edit.

Was I or was I not?

As far as I understand, putting the name of a game (aka a tag) in a title is not needed at all, unless its in the flow of the question.
Yet one of my edits was rejected because: "This edit does not make the post even a little bit easier to read, easier to find, more accurate or more accessible. Changes are either completely superfluous or actively harm readability."

I understand it was not a major edit and that the reject comment is correct in some way, but I still followed the guidelines. (i think)
According to these 2 threads on the meta, my edit was valid.

• Proposed edit rejected because it is too minor
• When should we edit game names out of question titles and why

And even here it says that question titles should not be "tag: question title"

I don't want to go around making bad or unnecessary edits, but I am under the impression that I was doing a valid edit.

Was I or was I not?

As far as I understand, putting the name of a game (aka a tag) in a title is not needed at all, unless its in the flow of the question.
Yet one of my edits was rejected because: "This edit does not make the post even a little bit easier to read, easier to find, more accurate or more accessible. Changes are either completely superfluous or actively harm readability."

I understand it was not a major edit and that the reject comment is correct in some way, but I still followed the guidelines. (i think)
According to these 2 threads on the meta, my edit was valid.

• Proposed edit rejected because it is too minor
• When should we edit game names out of question titles and why

And even here it says that question titles should not be "tag: question title"

I don't want to go around making bad or unnecessary edits, but I am under the impression that I was doing a valid edit.

Was I or was I not?

As far as I understand, putting the name of a game (aka a tag) in a title is not needed at all, unless its in the flow of the question.
Yet one of my edits was rejected because: "This edit does not make the post even a little bit easier to read, easier to find, more accurate or more accessible. Changes are either completely superfluous or actively harm readability."

I understand it was not a major edit and that the reject comment is correct in some way, but I still followed the guidelines. (i think)
According to these 2 threads on the meta, my edit was valid.

• Proposed edit rejected because it is too minor
• When should we edit game names out of question titles and why

And even here it says that question titles should not be "tag: question title"

I don't want to go around making bad or unnecessary edits, but I am under the impression that I was doing a valid edit.

Was I or was I not?