Timeline for Is it appropriate to flag old modded Minecraft crash questions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 28, 2019 at 13:30 | comment | added | Joachim | Is the third point still valid? | |
Mar 16, 2017 at 15:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.gaming.stackexchange.com/ with https://gaming.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Mar 16, 2017 at 15:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.gaming.stackexchange.com/ with https://gaming.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Mar 16, 2017 at 15:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.gaming.stackexchange.com/ with https://gaming.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Mar 16, 2017 at 15:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.gaming.stackexchange.com/ with https://gaming.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Jun 13, 2015 at 4:54 | comment | added | user43038 | They're like tribbles, really the only word I have to describe them. They also, due to their nature, don't age particularly well given how fast the mods, forge, and game itself tend to move. It's to the point now where the oldest (circa 1.6.4) aren't only off-topic, but have lost any relevance that they might have had. (Disclaimer: I play a ton of Minecraft) | |
Jun 13, 2015 at 4:23 | comment | added | angussidney | Yeah, I have had a look at this pot already. I think it's a good idea, similar to MrLemon's post. But still wondering if this is appropriate. | |
Jun 13, 2015 at 4:15 | history | answered | user43038 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |